They felt more honest than a dramatic bonfire would have felt.
I closed the closet door and went for a walk.
For the first time in months I passed a restaurant without wondering whether Preston might be inside.
Chapter 63: The Neighbor’s Question
A neighbor in my apartment building eventually learned about the case from an online article.
She stopped me near the mailboxes and asked whether it was true that I had walked in on my wife and her boss.
Her curiosity was blunt enough to make me laugh.
I said yes.
She asked whether I had punched him.
I said no.
She looked disappointed.
I explained that I had been more concerned about protecting records and ensuring the workers were paid than creating a fight that would accomplish nothing.
She said that sounded mature but not very satisfying.
I told her maturity was often less entertaining than people hoped.
A week later she brought me a pot of soup after I developed a bad cold.
She apologized for asking intrusive questions.
I thanked her for the soup.
We began exchanging spare keys for emergencies and taking turns replacing the stairwell bulbs.
The ordinary friendship reminded me that being known did not always mean being exposed.
People could hear a painful part of my story and still choose to meet me as a neighbor rather than a spectacle.
Chapter 64: A Different Kind of Trial
The civil proceedings continued while separate regulatory reviews developed.
A settlement conference produced partial agreements for harmed vendors.
Bellwether accepted responsibility for weaknesses in its payment controls without admitting every allegation made against individual employees.
Insurers and financial institutions negotiated recoveries subject to verified losses.
Some workers received money quickly.
Others waited because their transactions were harder to trace.
I learned to stop saying justice would arrive on a particular date.
I did not know that.
At a later hearing, a judge approved a structured accounting and set deadlines for unresolved claims.
Preston’s position at Bellwether ended.
His lawyers disputed elements of the independent report.
Rachel’s counsel continued pursuing records involving Esther’s fund.
I testified only about what I had personally observed, the missing payments, the briefcase, the garage conversation, and the business losses.
I did not testify about what Preston must have been thinking.
Daniel had taught me the difference between a fact, an inference, and a wish.
When questioned about the bedroom, I felt my throat tighten.
I said Preston was wearing my bathrobe and holding my watch.